The Internal Revenue Service released guidance this month to clarify the accounting treatment of payments under the Paycheck Protection Program and caused some consternation among some small businesses and tax experts. Many business owners who applied for loans under the PPP had the expectation the loans would be forgiven as long as their employees were paid for eight weeks, and the businesses would be able to write off their expenses as they traditionally have been able to do. The guidance puts this in doubt.
Notice 2020-32 clarifies that no deduction is allowed under the Internal Revenue Code for an expense that is otherwise deductible if the payment of the expense results in forgiveness of a covered loan under the CARES Act. The income associated with the forgiveness is excluded from gross income.
Leif O’Leary is the CEO of Alegeus.
Brian Wallheimer is editor-in-chief of Financial Planning, where he leads a team of journalists covering the wealth management industry. His coverage areas focus on practice management, client service and industry trends, providing actionable intelligence that helps financial advisors grow their practices and better serve clients.
Under his leadership, Financial Planning has been recognized with multiple industry accolades for excellence in journalism, including Jesse H. Neal, ASBPE, SABEW Best in Business and Folio's Eddie awards. The team's award-winning coverage has included reporting on industry conflicts of interest, diversity initiatives, government policy, evolving advisor models and an in-depth series on how to start an RIA.
Brian served as managing editor before being appointed editor-in-chief in 2022. He previously covered the Illinois General Assembly and governor for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch while earning his master's degree, and his career has included reporting and editing roles in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Indiana, where he covered government, higher education and some of the largest casinos in the world. He also worked as a science writer at Purdue University's College of Agriculture, developing stories about research and placing expert sources in coverage by The New York Times, NPR, the Chicago Tribune and other national, regional and local outlets.
Born and raised just outside St. Louis, Brian is a die-hard Cardinals fan. An Eagle Scout and avid hiker, he can sometimes convince at least one of his three children to join him on the trail.
Tobias Salinger is Financial Planning's chief correspondent, with more than a decade of experience covering wealth management, regulation and the business of financial advice. He specializes in investigations and enterprise reporting on advisory firm strategy, regulation, conflicts of interest, and diversity and equality across the industry.
Tobias has been recognized for his investigations and original reporting on the conflicts of interest that affect wealth management firms, as well as systemic racism in finance, winning more than a dozen honors, including the Jesse H. Neal, Azbees, SABEW Best in Business and Folio Eddie awards.
His award-winning coverage includes:
- Building Black Wealth in St. Louis
- The wealth management industry's $1T conflict of interest
- A black eye for FINRA? Brokers with checkered histories cast doubt on enforcement efforts
- Access denied: Systemic racism in financial services
- From sealed transcripts, the inside saga of LPL Financial's largest termination ever
Before Financial Planning, Tobias reported for the New York Daily News, Commercial Observer and City Limits. He holds a master's degree from the Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at the City University of New York (2013) and is an alumnus of the Fellowship at Auschwitz for the Study of Professional Ethics, an international program focused on how the lessons of history inform professional ethics today in journalism and many other fields.
Born and raised in Kansas City, Missouri, now based in Chicago, Tobias is an avid softball player, a novice bird watcher and reader of contemporary fiction.
Connect with Tobias on LinkedIn or reach him at: tobias.salinger@arizent.com.
Under section 1106(b) of the CARES Act, a recipient of a covered loan can receive forgiveness of indebtedness on the loan in an amount equal to the sum of payments made for the following expenses — payroll costs, any payment of interest on any covered mortgage obligation, any payment on any covered rent obligation and any covered utility payment — during the eight-week “covered period” beginning on the covered loan’s origination date.
The Paycheck Protection Program was designed to provide economic relief for businesses in the wake of COVID-19. If the requirements of section 1106(b) are met, PPP proceeds are excluded from taxable income and the corresponding PPP expenses that are essentially being reimbursed are not tax deductible despite being classified as ordinary expenses under section 162 of the Tax Code. Thus, PPP funding is a tax-exempt “wash” — PPP expenses are not tax deductible to the extent of tax-exempt PPP income. Since “PPP wages” are not currently tax deductible under the program, it will be interesting to see how businesses will be directed to prepare W-2s for 2020.
The CARES Act provides for the payment of fees from PPP funds for the processing of applications on a sliding scale beginning at a rate of 5 percent for loans up to $350,000. These fees have generally become earmarked for banks and other financial institutions despite the hope that many accounting and legal professionals would be eligible for these fees for services rendered in assisting clients to generate the needed paperwork throughout the application process. Banks are receiving tens of millions of dollars in fees from PPP funds to process loans for which they are not at risk. Banks are also collecting transfer fees from PPP funds when these proceeds are wired into business accounts.
The CARES Act legislation stimulus checks were processed based upon Form 1040 filings — essentially bypassing an application process. Similarly, perhaps PPP funding would be more efficiently disbursed if allocations were based upon prior Form 941 filings instead of assessing the same payroll information through a costly application process. Another relief measure would be to allow businesses to take tax deductions for PPP expenses despite the tax-exempt nature of PPP proceeds.
