Transfer pricing changes drive tax savings for coronavirus-impacted companies

Intercompany pricing corrections now can help generate cash by utilizing tax net operating losses.

In a pandemic environment, longstanding transfer pricing policies can lead to suboptimal tax results. Multinationals that incur losses in some locations while earning generous profits in others could be overpaying taxes. For many companies, modifications to intercompany pricing that reduce taxes payable and utilize losses are overlooked tax savings opportunities.

A multinational company's transfer prices of goods, royalties, services and loans affect where profits are generated, or the losses incurred in each country. For companies impacted by COVID-19, an assessment of estimated taxes payable and losses by country can highlight tax savings opportunities.

CORONAVIRUS IMPACT: ADDITIONAL COVERAGE

Julia Hu is an American entrepreneur and the co-founder and CEO of Lark. Founded on the personal experience of having grown up with an undiagnosed chronic condition, Julia is passionate about bringing compassionate care to those preventing or managing chronic disease. Hu was named to Business Insider’s 30 Under 40 Changing Healthcare list and was awarded as a member of the UCSF Health Awards Hall of Fame in 2021, as well as the EY Entrepreneurial Winning Women™ North America Class of 2021. Prior to founding Lark in 2011, Julia ran global startup incubator, the Clean Tech Open, built a sustainable construction startup, and was an Entrepreneur-in-Residence at Stanford’s StartX incubator. She is on the board of the Council for Diabetes Prevention and a Singularity University faculty member. Hu received her Master’s and Bachelor’s degrees at Stanford University and half of an MBA from MIT Sloan before founding Lark.

Bernie Dyme is president and CEO of Perspectives LTD, a behavioral health firm committed to delivering high-quality employee assistance programs, behavioral health, and organizational consulting services.  

He is passionate about ending the stigma attached to mental health ensuring that everyone in companies has full access to mental health services and also focuses on prevention and early intervention.  He is an active member of more than a dozen professional and community organizations that work toward his passion of bringing resources to all employees and organizations to ensure full access to help. These include the Employee Assistance Professionals Association (EAPA), the Society of Human Resource Professionals (SHRM), and the Executives Club of Chicago. He is also the Chair of the Advisory Council of The Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy and Practice at the University of Chicago. He is the past president of the Board of Directors for the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless and is currently an active member of the Board.  

Bernie is a licensed clinical social worker (LCSW). He has his master’s degree in social work from the University of Chicago. 

Brandon Roberts

Brandon Roberts is chief revenue officer, fitness & wellbeing for Xplor Technologies, a global platform for SMBs combining SaaS solutions with embedded payments and commerce accelerating technologies, where he leads a team of 200 commercial sales, account management and client service people across North America.

Before joining Xplor in 2020, Brandon spent eight years at Mindbody, ultimately as global director of operations. He has a B.S. in Kinesiology from California Polytechnic State University and a MBA from the University of Phoenix.

For many cross-border businesses, well-established policies have facilitated the pricing of intercompany goods, royalties, and services transactions over many years. However, even the most robust transfer pricing policies were not designed for pandemic-driven closures. As a result, multinational companies have a high global effective tax rate even when incurring company-wide losses. Paying unnecessary income tax bills is particularly painful for those companies already short on cash.

Tangible tax savings

An example may best illustrate the potential for savings from revisiting transfer pricing policies in the wake of the pandemic. In this situation, a wholly owned manufacturer relies on a sizeable cost-plus margin policy when selling inventory to the parent company.

For a subsidiary in a 30 percent tax rate jurisdiction, a $2 million reduction in transfer prices leads to $600,000 in tax savings by utilizing tax-inefficient parent company losses. Corrections to royalty rates and service fees have similar impacts. The result is the same: utilizing tax net operating losses in Country A while reducing Country B’s taxes. That being said, there does need to be economic substance to justify these changes.

Advertisement

Implementing tax savings

transfer-pricing-example-diagram.jpg

Utilizing tax NOLs in Country A while paying fewer income taxes in Country B is, at first glance, a straightforward concept. However, implementing corrections to transfer pricing often requires some planning. In my experience, senior management on both sides of the border needs to be involved in the decision-making process. Other issues, such as adjustments to Customs entries, are additional complications. Transfer pricing documentation is often well-advised support for changes to transfer prices.

Tax auditors may have questions about why transfer prices have changed. COVID-19 has transformed the global business environment, but preparing support to quantify the pandemic's impact on a company is advisable. Furthermore, making modifications before year-end is less complicated than afterward.

Now more than ever, multinational companies should consider modifications to transfer prices when assessing their global effective tax rate; however, changes to cross-border taxes need to be explained. While there are some complications, cash and tax savings can be well worth the effort.

More Thought Leadership

For years, creating a standout piece of B2B content was already challenging enough. Now, with AI tools churning out articles, social posts, and even entire white papers in minutes, the market is swamped with new content every day. Buyers and senior decision-makers rarely have the time—or the patience—to sift through it all. In an AI-flooded world, any veneer of "quality" can seem suspect if readers sense it might be auto-generated.

The decline of traditional search marketing is becoming impossible to ignore. Not long ago, a robust SEO strategy served as the backbone of inbound lead generation, supplying a steady flow of site visitors and form fills. But as AI-driven search evolves, many businesses now watch their organic traffic vanish—sometimes dramatically—because search engines are surfacing direct answers or relying on large language models (LLMs) to summarize content, causing fewer clicks to reach content-rich websites and publishers.

AI-driven search is rewriting how buyers find answers, and it's forcing a major change in how we think about inbound.